The Battle Between the Heart and Mind: Finding Balance in Healing
- Lex Enrico Santí, LCSW, MFA
- Mar 29
- 4 min read
Lex Enrico Santí, LCSW, MFA
As a therapist working on a college campus, I see daily the battle between the heart and the mind play out in students, faculty, and staff. Academia is a space that deeply values intellect—the ability to analyze, critique, and rationalize. In many ways, this environment conditions people to depend on their minds above all else, often at the expense of their hearts. I work with students and professors who are deeply entrenched in this way of being, believing that if they can just think hard enough, study enough, analyze enough, they will finally find freedom from their suffering. But this is an illusion.
Ram Dass famously illustrated this divide: "The mind sees suffering and rationalizes it, it says, 'there's a reason.' It sees someone homeless and says, 'get a job! What a faker!' Whereas the heart is in a place of constant openness and love. It says, 'I want to cure the suffering. I want to help others.'" The heart’s instinct is to give, to feel deeply, to dissolve into compassion, while the mind seeks structure, logic, and self-preservation.

The Tyranny of the Mind
René Descartes famously declared, "Cogito, ergo sum"—"I think, therefore I am." This foundational idea in Western thought has shaped how we perceive our identity, placing cognition above all else. In academia, this belief is reinforced daily—students, faculty, and professors are often trapped in the Jnana Yoga path, the path of knowledge, believing that if they can just master the mind, they will find the answers they seek.
But as Ram Dass reminds us, "The mind is a beautiful computer but a lousy master." Many intellectuals reach a breaking point where no amount of thinking, theorizing, or debating will free them from pain. The mind, designed to dissect and categorize, can only take them so far. True healing—true wisdom—demands a surrender to something beyond analysis.
The Heart’s Journey and Its Wounds
Unlike the mind, the heart operates on the plane of love, service, and connection. It does not demand rational proof or logical consistency; it simply feels. When it encounters suffering, it does not question why but rather asks, how can I help?
But the heart is fragile. It opens, it gives, and inevitably, it gets hurt. Over time, repeated disappointments—people taking advantage of kindness, betrayals, systemic injustices—can cause the heart to close. Many of my clients come to me at this very moment of closing, when the heart has been wounded so many times that it begins to harden. They retreat back into the mind, where it is safe, where logic prevails, where emotions cannot overwhelm them.
Yet healing requires the heart. When someone has spent a lifetime relying on intellect to shield themselves, part of my work is helping them find their way back—guiding them toward balance between the heart’s openness and the mind’s discernment.
Letting Go of the Mind in Higher Education
The culture of academia feeds the illusion that understanding suffering intellectually is enough. Professors and students alike believe that if they can write about suffering, theorize about it, study its mechanisms, they will somehow be able to transcend it. But no amount of research can replace the actual experience of feeling, of opening, of surrendering.
The most brilliant scholars in the world can still be miserable because the mind alone does not free us. In therapy, I often work with students and faculty who are desperately trying to think their way out of depression, anxiety, and burnout. But the heart, the part of them that feels and connects, has often been neglected.
The Balance Between Heart and Mind
There is a way to balance the heart and the mind—to allow the mind to serve rather than rule. Jnana Yoga is not inherently flawed, but when the mind becomes the sole authority, suffering is inevitable. The path forward requires integrating the heart’s wisdom with the mind’s clarity.
The Bhagavad Gita offers insight into this: "Perform your duty without attachment to the fruits of action." This means working, thinking, and learning—but without the illusion that knowledge alone will bring peace. Peace comes from opening, from acting in service without ego, from allowing oneself to feel deeply without fear of pain.
My Own Lessons as a Therapist
As a therapist, I also struggle with the balance between holding space for my clients and letting go of attachment to their outcomes. If I allow my mind to judge their progress, to measure their growth as if therapy were a graded exam, I become trapped in my own intellect. If I allow my heart to take on their pain fully, I burn out. The key is in surrender—helping without attachment, serving without controlling.
In my own life, I’ve seen how the heart can create obligations where none should exist. At times, I have collected people who depended on me simply because I was good at helping. I have learned that being a therapist is not volunteer work; it is a profession. It carries deep karmic value, but it is not meant to be martyrdom. Likewise, relationships—friendships, romantic connections—are not acts of charity. They should be mutual and symbiotic. If you are burned out from giving, it may be time to reframe your relationships.
Healing by Integrating the Two
The work of healing—both personally and in therapy—is finding where the heart and mind can meet. The mind is necessary to navigate the world, to set boundaries, to structure thoughts. The heart is necessary to experience the world, to connect, to love.
The way forward is not through abandoning the mind but through allowing it to serve rather than dictate. To let the heart lead, while using the mind as a tool, not as a master.
As Ram Dass said, "Only that in you which is me can hear what I'm saying."
The mind may read those words and dissect them, looking for meaning. The heart simply knows.
Comments